Where are the railways monitoring reports?

No new social monitoring reports on the railways rehabilitation project have been published since November 2012, raising concerns about the lack of external monitoring of the project as well as public access to information regarding the project. Redecam, the supposedly independent project monitor hired by the government, is meant to submit quarterly reports featuring details of the social impacts of the the ADB and AusAID-financed project. These are subsequently uploaded to the ADB website for public access. Yet the latest publicly available report, #19, covers the time period Aug-Nov 2012, and no reports have been public since. While the quality of Redecam’s reports has generally been poor, the lack of reports entirely underlines the ongoing lack of transparency and accountability that has plagued the railways project from the get-go.

Affected Households reach out to ADB Accountability Mechanism, but eligibility is hard to come by

The ADB’s Accountability Mechanism accepts complaints by people harmed, or who are likely to be harmed, by ADB projects. In Cambodia, households affected by the railways rehabilitation project have actively sought to use this mechanism, following well-documented harms suffered as a result of resettlement under the project. A look at the website of the Office of the Special Project Facilitator (OSPF, one arm of the Accountability Mechanism), however reveals that out of four complaints submitted and registered, only one has to date been found eligible. Two complaints have been found ineligible, while the result of the deliberation on the most recent complaint – received by the OSPF on Mar. 26, 2013 – is yet to be made public. As such, it seems only the hundred or so complainants on the eligible OSPF have been able to (possibly) benefit from the ADB’s Accountability Mechanism (results of the OSPF’s intervention are not publicly available). Given that the railways rehabilitation project has negatively affected thousands of households in Cambodia (civil society monitors have documented systematic harms suffered by affected households) and any OSPF intervention benefits only those households who submitted the complaint, the situation with the OSPF raises important questions regarding the accessibility of the ADB’s Accountability Mechanism and the potential benefits it provides to project affected people.

(It should be noted that the ADB Compliance Review Panel (CRP), the independent arm of the Accountability Mechanism, has accepted a complaint by households affected by the railways rehabilitation project, however, given the different functions of the OSPF and CRP, questions remain about the accessibility of the former.)

BABC: Rehabilitation of the Cambodian Railway is Impoverishing Affected Families


Rehabilitation of the Cambodian Railway is Impoverishing Affected Families

February 13, 2012

A problematic aid project in Cambodia has violated the rights of affected people and left many families mired in debt and deeper poverty, Bridges Across Borders Cambodia (BABC) said in a report released Monday.

The report, DERAILED, reviews the resettlement process and impacts of the Rehabilitation of the Cambodian Railway Project, which aims to restore the country’s 650 kilometres of railway infrastructure.

The project, financed mainly by development assistance from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the Government of Australia, stands to affect around 4164 families who live alongside the dilapidated railway tracks. At least 1200 families are required to relocate in order to make way for the project. A joint venture of the Australian firm Toll Holdings and the Cambodian firm Royal Group secured a 30-year concession to operate the refurbished railways.

BABC has closely monitored the resettlement process since early 2010 and interviewed more than 200 affected households to ascertain the extent to which the Railway Rehabilitation Project has complied with the ADB safeguard policy and international law obligations.

“Our principal finding is that the resettlement process for this project has fallen well short of ADB’s policy requirements and basic human rights obligations,” said BABC Executive Director David Pred.

“These requirements are critical to ensuring that the rights of people who are displaced by development projects are upheld throughout the resettlement process and that their lives are not made worse off as a result,” he added.

The report found that meaningful consultation with affected households on resettlement options and information disclosure on compensation entitlements was precluded by an atmosphere of intimidation and coercion. The result is that many families have been forced to accept very low compensation, which has led to deterioration in their living conditions.

Some families have been left unable to reconstruct adequate housing that meets minimum standards under international law, which amounts to a serious violation of human rights.

None of the five Project-sponsored resettlement sites were fully prepared with basic services and facilities when resettlement commenced, causing considerable hardship to resettled families. Lack of access to safe, sufficient and affordable water has been a particular concern.

Resettlement sites are located far away from people’s original homes and places of business, with minimal opportunities to generate new income. Despite the known risk of income reduction or joblessness upon resettlement, effective income restoration programs have not been implemented many months after resettlement.

The cumulative effect of inadequate compensation, increased expenses and reduced incomes on households has led the majority of the resettled families that BABC interviewed into unmanageable debt to private moneylenders, a common trigger for a downward spiral into destitution.

“It is unacceptable for the poorest citizens to be asked to pay the price of economic development, but it is scandalous that these costs should be borne by the poor for a project financed largely by international development agencies whose missions are to alleviate poverty,” said David Pred.

“Cambodian people appreciate international development assistance, but we want to see this aid prioritizing the poorest and most vulnerable people in society,” said BABC Program Manager Eang Vuthy.

“However, we have observed through our work with communities affected by the Railways project that their living conditions have gotten worse and worse since they have been resettled,” he added.

The risks of resettlement are well-known, but they can be prevented through smart planning backed up by sufficient resources and the implementation of safeguard policies, which are designed to protect people from the precise harms they are experiencing as a result of this project. When resettlement cannot be avoided for infrastructure projects such as this, it should be turned into a development opportunity for affected people.

“Far from shouldering the costs of the project, the families who are forced to give up their land, homes and communities should be entitled to share the benefits of the project so that their lives may be improved,” said David Pred.

“The ADB and AusAID must take urgent appropriate action, together with the Royal Government of Cambodia, to remedy the situation and bring this project into compliance with international law and ADB policies. Toll Holdings and Royal Group should also contribute a share of the revenues from freight operations to programs that directly benefit the affected people,” he said.

“We would like to see the private companies benefiting from this public investment give something back to the people who have given up so much to make this project possible,” said Eang Vuthy.

“That is not just corporate social responsibility, it is common decency,” he added.


Additional Information

The report is available at the following link: http://www.babcambodia.org/derailed
An accompanying video is also available at: http://www.babcambodia.org/railways

Hard copies of the report are available at BABC’s offices in Phnom Penh, located at: #55 Street 101, Boeung Trabek, Phnom Penh, CambodiaThe report will also be presented at the event “Aid and Accountability: Safeguarding Rights in High-Risk Development Projects” at Monash University Law Chambers, 555 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne, Australia at 12:30pm on February 13th.

For more information, please contact:

David Pred, Executive Director
Email: david@babcambodia.org
Tel. in Australia: (+61) 487443807

Eang Vuthy, Development Watch Program Manager
Email: vuthy@babcambodia.org
Tel. in Australia: (+61) 418146603


Bridges Across Borders Cambodia is an international non-governmental organization working to support people’s action for social justice, inclusive development and human rights in Cambodia.

Phnom Penh relocation site: safeguards violations continue?

Despite many complaints from affected households and following the silencing of NGOs monitoring the resettlement impacts of the railways rehabilitation, many Phnom Penh households have been given until the end of the month, in the middle of the rainy season as well as religious festival Pchum Ben, to move from their homes along the railway tracks.

Like elsewhere in the country, the project’s relocation of the Phnom Penh families seems rife with problems and potential safeguards violations. The relocation site, Trapeang Anchangh, is for some of the families around 30km from their former homes. Many have received less than US$1,000 to relocate to the new site, which exemplifies complete lack of creative planning in the lay-out of the plots for the almost 200 households expected there. Don’t expect trees for shelter either – the site is next to another relocated community in the middle of rice fields, though relatively close to a posh golf course highlighting the growing difference between the rich and the poor in Cambodia.

While piped and drinkable water is communally available, those already resident at the site report they are required to pay around 150,000 riels for water connection to their new homes, and a similar amount for electricity connection. According to the ADB, relocated households should be exempt these costs, yet affected households around the country report similarly.

Around one quarter of the plots are currently occupied and/or show signs of ongoing building work. Some dwellings look as though they have been rebuilt by the occupants exactly the way they were in their old location, while other families have taken out loans to build stronger brick structures. Some families live in extremely basic tarpaulin tents, which they say flood each time it rains. The drainage does not appear to be working, and residents say they are having to spend a lot of money lifting the ground before building their new homes on it.

Most are worried about their income. Many are former city dwellers used to making their money from the hustle and bustle of the capital. Here, in the middle of rice fields, there is nothing. (Perhaps they might be able to get jobs at the gold course?) The Income Restoration Programme – also part of the ADB-approved resettlement plan – is nowhere to be seen.